Prediction of Gerard Campana Lee [405th] vs Jason Murray Kubler [373rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W W L
Form
W W W W W L W W W LH2H: Lee 0 - 0 Kubler
| Lee | Stats | Kubler |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (6-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 75% (18-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 405 | Ranking | 373 |
| 318 | Highest Rank | 63 |
| 20 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 23 |
| 51% (71-67) | Career Total W/L | 67% (432-212) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,200,795 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gerard Campana Lee vs Jason Murray Kubler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lee 0 - 0 Kubler
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lee has won 43.58% of points on their second serve, while Kubler has won 46.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lee, in recent form, has won 52.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kubler has won 44.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.74% and 21.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lee has saved 49.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kubler has saved 56.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lee has won 50% of matches played (W/L 28/ 28), with Kubler winning 75.76% (W/L 25/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 66/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Kubler has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 243/ 105), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Lee has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.02% of matches (W/L 25/ 24), where as Kubler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 20/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lee has played against opponents with an average rank of 389 while Kubler has played against players with an average rank of 456.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lee has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kubler has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lee has converted 34.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kubler has converted 28.95% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Arthur Gea
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Daniel Masur
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
55%
(
75 of
136)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
104)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
52%
(
32 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
58 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(5) 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
108)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Finn Bass
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
40%
(
22 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
9
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Jarrod Joyce
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Yuichiro Inui
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Cruz Hewitt
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Joshua Sheehy
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
6
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Shintaro Imai
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Joshua Charlton
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Lee vs Kubler?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Lee Vs Kubler is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (71/67) | Win/Loss | 67% (432/212) |
| 52% (168/155) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (959/542) |
| 51% (1581/1542) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7788/6321) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 261 | Aces Total | 2064 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 474 | Total Double Faults | 1775 |
| 1:47:7 | Average Match Time | 1:8:42 |
| 392.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 500.76 |
| 62% (5631/9151) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18559/30162) |
| 64% (3624/5631) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (13236/18559) |
| 48% (1700/3520) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5869/11602) |
| 47% (433/931) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1359/3104) |
| 42% (3731/8906) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12181/30412) |
| 51% (70/136) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (413/603) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 51% (18/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (111/199) |
| 45% (21/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (104/181) |
| 77% (79/61) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (411/370) |
| 23% (79/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (411/38) |
| 17% (59/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (233/61) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gerard Campana Lee
View full predicted draw for Lee
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jason Murray Kubler
View full predicted draw for Kubler
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
